Kumon is the lighter bet on entry — $102K vs $118K (about $16K less). Kumon runs the bigger network at 1705 vs 433 outlets.
Numbers that separate them on a 5-year horizon — not the franchise-development pitch.
The operational model splits the room: Kumon expects high involvement; Sylvan Learning expects medium involvement. If you're an absentee investor this matters as much as the capex — the wrong match burns you via under-managed operations.
On pure entry capital, Kumon is 1.2× cheaper than Sylvan Learning — $102K vs $118K. That gap compounds over a 5-year horizon because build-out, equipment, opening inventory and the additional funds in FDD Item 7 all scale with format size.
Kumon is expanding fastest here — 25 outlets per year since founding in 1958. High-velocity brands signal momentum but also mean new territory for individual franchisees gets handed out quickly; lock in your preferred area early.
Primary format per brand, from FDD Item 7. A brand's smaller express or non-traditional formats can cost materially less.
Total initial investment, low end of each brand's FDD Item 7 range for its primary format. Several US brands also run smaller express, non-traditional or conversion formats at materially lower investment — check the brand page for the full Item 7 table.
Total US outlets from FDD Item 20. Bigger networks mean more brand recognition and supplier scale; smaller ones mean less intra-brand competition in your trade area.
Which brand's outlets are rated higher by customers, aggregated across locations. Exact star rating and review volume are in Brand Health.
Direction only — the underlying rating & review count are Pro data.
Straight from each brand’s FDD. Green badge marks the more favourable value for a typical first-time operator.
| Metric | Kumon | Sylvan Learning |
|---|---|---|
| Initial investment (Item 7) | $102K ↓ Lower | $118K |
| Royalty (Item 6) | — | 11% |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Min space (sq ft) | 1000 | 1000 |
| Total US outlets (Item 20) | 1705 ↑ Bigger | 433 |
| Franchise fee (Item 5) | $2K ↓ Lower | $47K |
| Additional funds | — | — |
BrandFit asks 6 visual questions about your operator profile, capital, and location — then ranks all 184 brands by predicted success-fit for your situation. See where these brands really stand for someone like you.
FRANticc is independently run. We are not the franchisor, and neither brand pays us. Submit your enquiry through either brand’s page.
Same data plus the full FDD breakdown, fee load, contract fairness and SBA lending picture — free on every brand page.
Visitors researching this pair often look at these.
Wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD for SERP rich-result eligibility.
Payback on a Education & Training franchise in the US typically runs 24–48 months, depending on site traffic, build-out cost, and the royalty plus ad-fund load in FDD Item 6. The brands on this page start at $102K of initial investment (Item 7); pair that with the brand's Item 19 financial performance representation, where one is published, to model your own payback instead of relying on a franchise-development pitch.
Among the 2 brands FRANticc compares, the top options by network size are Kumon, Sylvan Learning (Kumon: 1705 stores, Sylvan Learning: 433 stores). The lowest investment entry is Kumon from $102K. "Best" depends on your capital, your market and how hands-on you plan to be — this page gives you the data for all three dimensions.
Territory is FDD Item 12, and it is where Education & Training franchisors differ most. Some grant a protected radius or a defined trade area; many grant no exclusivity at all and reserve the right to open company units, non-traditional locations or e-commerce channels inside your area. Read Item 12 word for word — "protected territory" and "exclusive territory" are not the same thing — then ask existing franchisees whether the brand has honoured it.
Yes — multi-unit ownership is the norm in mature US Education & Training systems, and most franchisors sell it as an area development agreement: a fee paid up front for the right to open N units on a fixed schedule inside a defined territory. The terms sit in FDD Items 5 and 12. Miss the development schedule and the franchisor can usually reclaim the territory, so treat the schedule as a covenant, not a target.
For a first-time franchisee, capital preservation matters more than brand prestige. Kumon has the lower entry capex here, which caps downside if the location underperforms. That said, first-time operators should also weigh how much hand-holding the brand provides in site selection, training, and SOP enforcement — not just the sticker price.