Hikvision is 2.0× cheaper to get into — ₹10 L vs ₹20 L (about ₹10 lakh less). Yale runs the bigger network at 2000 vs 1500 outlets.
Numbers that separate them on a 5-year horizon — not the dealer-pitch summary.
None of these carry a recurring royalty — but that is how the distributor format works, not a concession won by the operator. Every brand on this model earns from the wholesale-to-retail spread instead, so the number that decides your economics is the buying margin and any volume commitment behind it, not the royalty line.
On pure entry capital, Hikvision is 2.0× cheaper than Yale — ₹10 L vs ₹20 L. That gap compounds over a 5-year horizon because working capital and rent deposit scale with format size.
Primary (flagship) format per brand. Smaller kiosk / express formats may have different economics.
Primary (flagship) franchise format per brand. Some brands also offer smaller kiosk / cloud-kitchen formats at lower capex — check the brand page for full format options.
Bigger networks mean more brand recognition and supplier scale; smaller ones mean less intra-brand competition in your territory.
Which brand's outlets are rated higher by customers, aggregated across locations. Exact star rating and review volume are in Brand Health.
Direction only — the underlying rating & review count are Pro data.
Every verified data point. Green badge marks the more favourable value for a typical first-time operator.
| Metric | Yale | Hikvision |
|---|---|---|
| Entry capex | ₹20 L | ₹10 L ↓ Lower |
| Royalty | 0% | 0% |
| Gross marginExact margin % + full unit economicsFood-cost, royalty drag and the monthly P&L behind "Higher".Unlock with Pro → | Lower | Higher |
| Min space (sqft) | 300 | 250 ↓ Smaller |
| Total outlets | 2000 ↑ Bigger | 1500 |
| Franchise fee | — | — |
| Working capital | ₹15 L | ₹6 L |
BrandFit asks 6 visual questions about your operator profile, capital, and location — then ranks all 240 brands by predicted success-fit for your situation. See where these brands really stand for someone like you.
Open this pair plus CP Plus (the next-largest Security & CCTV brands by network size) side-by-side in the full comparison tool. Add or swap brands to fit your decision.
Same data plus galleries, store-locator, margin economics, legal vault — free on every brand page.
Visitors researching this pair often look at these.
Wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD for SERP rich-result eligibility.
Brand expansion strategies differ: Yale and brands with 200+ outlets typically have active Tier-2/3 pipelines; smaller or premium brands often focus Tier-1 metros first. FRANticc's store locator on each brand page shows existing cities — if a brand already has 3+ outlets in your tier, expansion policy likely permits new franchises there.
The lowest-investment option here is Hikvision starting from ₹10 L. Remember this is the brand's minimum capex — your actual outlay includes a refundable security deposit, rent deposit (1–6 months), and working capital.
Most Indian Security & CCTV franchises pay the operator via product-margin on supply (cost-to-MRP spread) rather than explicit revenue share. Brands with 0% royalty usually recoup their cut inside supply pricing. Brands with stated royalty (commonly 3–10%) take it on top of product margin. Calculate effective take-home on both structures before you sign.
Territorial exclusivity varies sharply across Security & CCTV operators and is rarely enforced uniformly. Most Indian franchise agreements carve out a "protected radius" (typically 500m–2km) rather than exclusive geographic zones. Always read the "Non-Competition" and "Protected Territory" clauses of the franchise agreement — and verify by asking existing franchisees if the brand has honoured them.
FRANticc's database lists 2 brands matching this comparison with verified investment data, store counts, and format details. Several more are covered across our full directory. Every data point cites its public source.