HomeVestors is 2.0× cheaper to get into — $150K vs $304K (about $154K less). HomeVestors runs the bigger network at 862 vs 758 outlets.
Numbers that separate them on a 5-year horizon — not the franchise-development pitch.
The operational model splits the room: HomeVestors expects medium involvement; Express Employment Professionals expects high involvement. If you're an absentee investor this matters as much as the capex — the wrong match burns you via under-managed operations.
HomeVestors (862 outlets) and Express Employment Professionals (758) operate at comparable scale — neither has a decisive network advantage, so your location-specific due diligence matters more than brand size here.
On pure entry capital, HomeVestors is 2.0× cheaper than Express Employment Professionals — $150K vs $304K. That gap compounds over a 5-year horizon because build-out, equipment, opening inventory and the additional funds in FDD Item 7 all scale with format size.
Primary format per brand, from FDD Item 7. A brand's smaller express or non-traditional formats can cost materially less.
Total initial investment, low end of each brand's FDD Item 7 range for its primary format. Several US brands also run smaller express, non-traditional or conversion formats at materially lower investment — check the brand page for the full Item 7 table.
Total US outlets from FDD Item 20. Bigger networks mean more brand recognition and supplier scale; smaller ones mean less intra-brand competition in your trade area.
Which brand's outlets are rated higher by customers, aggregated across locations. Exact star rating and review volume are in Brand Health.
Direction only — the underlying rating & review count are Pro data.
Straight from each brand’s FDD. Green badge marks the more favourable value for a typical first-time operator.
| Metric | HomeVestors | Express Employment Professionals |
|---|---|---|
| Initial investment (Item 7) | $150K ↓ Lower | $304K |
| Royalty (Item 6) | 2% | — |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Min space (sq ft) | 600 | — |
| Total US outlets (Item 20) | 862 ↑ Bigger | 758 |
| Franchise fee (Item 5) | $85K | — |
| Additional funds | — | — |
BrandFit asks 6 visual questions about your operator profile, capital, and location — then ranks all 184 brands by predicted success-fit for your situation. See where these brands really stand for someone like you.
FRANticc is independently run. We are not the franchisor, and neither brand pays us. Submit your enquiry through either brand’s page.
Same data plus the full FDD breakdown, fee load, contract fairness and SBA lending picture — free on every brand page.
Visitors researching this pair often look at these.
Wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD for SERP rich-result eligibility.
There's no universal winner. HomeVestors suits operators who value lower entry capex and faster capital recovery. Express Employment Professionals suits operators who have the capital for a premium launch and prefer established scale. Your location's traffic profile, your available capital, and your operating style together determine the right answer.
HomeVestors operates the largest network among these — 862 outlets. Large networks offer more brand recognition and supplier scale, but also mean denser intra-brand competition in already-saturated markets.
Payback on a Services franchise in the US typically runs 24–48 months, depending on site traffic, build-out cost, and the royalty plus ad-fund load in FDD Item 6. The brands on this page start at $150K of initial investment (Item 7); pair that with the brand's Item 19 financial performance representation, where one is published, to model your own payback instead of relying on a franchise-development pitch.
Among these brands, the smallest footprint is HomeVestors at 600+ sqft. Square footage is only half the site test — most US franchisors also specify traffic counts, co-tenancy, parking ratios and a trade-area population in the franchise agreement, and will reject a site that hits the minimum footprint but misses those.
US Services franchisors almost always take a percentage of gross sales, not a share of profit — so the fee is due whether or not the unit is profitable. FDD Item 6 lists the full stack: royalty (commonly 4–8%), a national advertising fund (1–4%), technology fees, and often a local-marketing minimum. Add them together before modelling take-home; the headline royalty is rarely the whole load.