EXIT Realty is 3.0× cheaper to get into — $61K vs $184K (about $123K less). Keller Williams runs the bigger network at 735 vs 518 outlets.
Numbers that separate them on a 5-year horizon — not the franchise-development pitch.
The operational model splits the room: Keller Williams expects 0 involvement; EXIT Realty expects high involvement. If you're an absentee investor this matters as much as the capex — the wrong match burns you via under-managed operations.
Keller Williams has 1.4× more outlets than EXIT Realty (735 vs 518) — more brand recognition and supplier scale, but also denser intra-brand competition in saturated markets.
On pure entry capital, EXIT Realty is 3.0× cheaper than Keller Williams — $61K vs $184K. That gap compounds over a 5-year horizon because build-out, equipment, opening inventory and the additional funds in FDD Item 7 all scale with format size.
Primary format per brand, from FDD Item 7. A brand's smaller express or non-traditional formats can cost materially less.
Total initial investment, low end of each brand's FDD Item 7 range for its primary format. Several US brands also run smaller express, non-traditional or conversion formats at materially lower investment — check the brand page for the full Item 7 table.
Total US outlets from FDD Item 20. Bigger networks mean more brand recognition and supplier scale; smaller ones mean less intra-brand competition in your trade area.
Which brand's outlets are rated higher by customers, aggregated across locations. Exact star rating and review volume are in Brand Health.
Direction only — the underlying rating & review count are Pro data.
Straight from each brand’s FDD. Green badge marks the more favourable value for a typical first-time operator.
| Metric | Keller Williams | EXIT Realty |
|---|---|---|
| Initial investment (Item 7) | $184K | $61K ↓ Lower |
| Royalty (Item 6) | 6% | — |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Min space (sq ft) | 2000 | 750 ↓ Smaller |
| Total US outlets (Item 20) | 735 ↑ Bigger | 518 |
| Franchise fee (Item 5) | $35K | $8K ↓ Lower |
| Additional funds | — | — |
BrandFit asks 6 visual questions about your operator profile, capital, and location — then ranks all 184 brands by predicted success-fit for your situation. See where these brands really stand for someone like you.
FRANticc is independently run. We are not the franchisor, and neither brand pays us. Submit your enquiry through either brand’s page.
Same data plus the full FDD breakdown, fee load, contract fairness and SBA lending picture — free on every brand page.
Visitors researching this pair often look at these.
Wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD for SERP rich-result eligibility.
Keller Williams operates the largest network among these — 735 outlets. Large networks offer more brand recognition and supplier scale, but also mean denser intra-brand competition in already-saturated markets.
Payback on a Real Estate Brokerage franchise in the US typically runs 24–48 months, depending on site traffic, build-out cost, and the royalty plus ad-fund load in FDD Item 6. The brands on this page start at $61K of initial investment (Item 7); pair that with the brand's Item 19 financial performance representation, where one is published, to model your own payback instead of relying on a franchise-development pitch.
FDD Item 7 is the honest list, and it runs well past the headline number: initial franchise fee (Item 5), leasehold improvements and build-out, equipment and signage, opening inventory, insurance, training travel, grand-opening advertising, and three months of additional funds. On top of that sit the recurring Item 6 fees — royalty, national ad fund, technology, and often a local-marketing minimum. FRANticc separates the one-time spend from the recurring load on every brand page so you see the real exposure.
Yes — multi-unit ownership is the norm in mature US Real Estate Brokerage systems, and most franchisors sell it as an area development agreement: a fee paid up front for the right to open N units on a fixed schedule inside a defined territory. The terms sit in FDD Items 5 and 12. Miss the development schedule and the franchisor can usually reclaim the territory, so treat the schedule as a covenant, not a target.