Century 21 is the lighter bet on entry — $36K vs $37K (about $1K less). RE/MAX runs the bigger network at 2994 vs 1685 outlets. RE/MAX takes less off the top (1% royalty vs 6%).
Numbers that separate them on a 5-year horizon — not the franchise-development pitch.
On pure entry capital, Century 21 is 1.0× cheaper than RE/MAX — $36K vs $37K. That gap compounds over a 5-year horizon because build-out, equipment, opening inventory and the additional funds in FDD Item 7 all scale with format size.
Century 21 charges 6% royalty on revenue — recurring, uncapped, and deducted before your own margin is calculated. Factor it into every pro-forma.
Primary format per brand, from FDD Item 7. A brand's smaller express or non-traditional formats can cost materially less.
Total initial investment, low end of each brand's FDD Item 7 range for its primary format. Several US brands also run smaller express, non-traditional or conversion formats at materially lower investment — check the brand page for the full Item 7 table.
Total US outlets from FDD Item 20. Bigger networks mean more brand recognition and supplier scale; smaller ones mean less intra-brand competition in your trade area.
Which brand's outlets are rated higher by customers, aggregated across locations. Exact star rating and review volume are in Brand Health.
Direction only — the underlying rating & review count are Pro data.
Straight from each brand’s FDD. Green badge marks the more favourable value for a typical first-time operator.
| Metric | RE/MAX | Century 21 |
|---|---|---|
| Initial investment (Item 7) | $37K | $36K ↓ Lower |
| Royalty (Item 6) | 1% ↓ Lower | 6% |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Min space (sq ft) | 600 | — |
| Total US outlets (Item 20) | 2994 ↑ Bigger | 1685 |
| Franchise fee (Item 5) | $9K ↓ Lower | $25K |
| Additional funds | — | — |
BrandFit asks 6 visual questions about your operator profile, capital, and location — then ranks all 184 brands by predicted success-fit for your situation. See where these brands really stand for someone like you.
FRANticc is independently run. We are not the franchisor, and neither brand pays us. Submit your enquiry through either brand’s page.
Same data plus the full FDD breakdown, fee load, contract fairness and SBA lending picture — free on every brand page.
Visitors researching this pair often look at these.
Wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD for SERP rich-result eligibility.
FDD Item 7 is the honest list, and it runs well past the headline number: initial franchise fee (Item 5), leasehold improvements and build-out, equipment and signage, opening inventory, insurance, training travel, grand-opening advertising, and three months of additional funds. On top of that sit the recurring Item 6 fees — royalty, national ad fund, technology, and often a local-marketing minimum. FRANticc separates the one-time spend from the recurring load on every brand page so you see the real exposure.
There's no universal winner. RE/MAX suits operators who value brand prestige and larger-format positioning. Century 21 suits operators who want to test the market with smaller initial exposure. Your location's traffic profile, your available capital, and your operating style together determine the right answer.
For a first-time franchisee, capital preservation matters more than brand prestige. Century 21 has the lower entry capex here, which caps downside if the location underperforms. That said, first-time operators should also weigh how much hand-holding the brand provides in site selection, training, and SOP enforcement — not just the sticker price.
Yes — multi-unit ownership is the norm in mature US Real Estate Brokerage systems, and most franchisors sell it as an area development agreement: a fee paid up front for the right to open N units on a fixed schedule inside a defined territory. The terms sit in FDD Items 5 and 12. Miss the development schedule and the franchisor can usually reclaim the territory, so treat the schedule as a covenant, not a target.